| |
|
News and Feature Stories from
STARpod.org

September 20, 2007
Recently we learned
from
Gus Russo that the
super-secretive National
Security Agency (NSA)
may still be in the
psychic spying business.
READ THE STORY
What if there
was a time
machine that
could look into
the future: a
way to
circumvent the
proverbial "bolt
from the blue"
lightning
attack?
READ THE STORY
Sunday,
August 12, 2007
Ever wonder what kind of
web-based sources of
information can trigger
an alert? These days
everything appears to be
on a hair-trigger,
probably because public
officials are afraid of
being caught with their
pants down if an
independent alert just
happens to get it right.
A recent example
involves a
Jerusalem-based website,
Debka.com which
Associated Press cites
as the source of
heightened security in
New York City. The
warning issued by Debka,
allegedly based upon
intercepted al Qaida
messages, predicted a
possible dirty bomb
attack, against New York
City, Los Angeles, and
Miami.
Debka is self-reporting
the reaction to the
online report:
New York scales down
extra security measures
a day after responding
to al Qaeda radiological
threat reported in
DEBKAfile
August 12, 2007, 8:48 AM
(GMT+02:00) New York
police reduced the extra
security procedures that
were introduced Friday
night, Aug. 10, after
DEBKAfile
reported a surge in on
al Qaeda Websites
threatening New York,
Los Angeles and Miami
with dirty bomb attack
by trucks carrying
radioactive bombs.
The three cities
identified as potential
targets by Debka are
among the list of likely
port city targets for a
nuclear terrorist
incident; we'd add the
San Francisco area,
Seattle, and San Diego
on the west coast to the
top of the list.
According to author Jon
Ronson, remote viewer
Angela Thompson warned
of mushroom clouds over
Denver, Seattle, and
Florida. Coastal cities
with major sea ports
would be likely targets
for a terrorist nuclear
attack, as was recently
emphasized by the July
appearance of Homeland
Security chief
Michael Chertoff at the
Port of Los Angeles.
Chertoff appeared at a
firestation near the
port of Los Angeles,
which is adjacent to the
port of Long Beach, the
subject of a
RAND study on the use of
a nuclear weapon of mass
destruction. Just
weeks before the
Chertoff visit, a
privately-sourced
psychic warning had
identified the port of
Long Beach as a possible
target of a 'loose nuke'
but the 'remote-viewed'
data suggested that it
was the RAND report that
had been picked up and
not a real threat. The
remote viewed
information identified
an 'executive' and a
fire station near the
port of Long Beach (Chertoff
appeared at a fire
station in the nearby
port of Los Angeles) and
the yield and effects of
the possible attack
closely matched the RAND
study.
If any of this has you
questioning the ability
of government officials
to thwart a real attack,
we'd like to point out
that Chertoff "unveiled
a new strategy for the
rapid resumption of
trade
after a terrorist
attack at a major U.S.
port."
EXEMPT from LEGAL RECOURSE
FBI
Told of National Security Issue Buried in UFO Tale
November 2, 2006
New details released by the on-line investigative report
produced by Starstream Research
An on-going investigation by Starstream Research revealed
that in late
August of this year three agents of the Washington Bureau of the
FBI met
with an undisclosed party and discussed a UFO tale involving
several former
and present government intelligence officers. Multiple sources
have
confirmed that following this meeting concerns were raised that
secure
government vaults may have been breached at a USAF base and Los
Alamos
National Laboratory, under the guise of a 'harmless' UFO
investigation.
Discussion of this issue was directed to an official under the
Office of the
Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and eventually
transmitted between
official government email servers. Some of the confidential
information was
passed to a SSR contributing writer, and later confirmed by a
party directly
involved in the investigation.
The SSR contributing writer has received a request not to
publish
transcripts of confidential email messages on the web.
Previously concerns had been raised that sensitive or classified
material
had been passed in a series of counterfeit government UFO
documents. One
government source suggested that counter-intelligence
information targeted
to the KGB had been publicly released within some of the
documents. A prior
investigation by the FBI had concluded that the documents were
"bogus."
Starstream Research first learned of the renewed interest in the
bogus
documents from an independent researcher, following on-going contact
with a high
ranking U.S. Government intelligence officer. An amicable
meeting with the
officer and his wife in Washington, D.C. later took on a bizarre
twist, when
the researcher was accused of asking inappropriate questions about a
sensitive
operation, resulting in cancellation of previously scheduled
meetings with a
former USAF counter-intelligence officer and other sources at
the center of
the UFO tale.
A consultation with the researcher and another source present at the
meeting
determined that the most likely explanation involved a
deliberate effort to
scare off potential sources of information about the AVIARY, an
unofficial
and loosely knit group of present and former government
intelligence
officers interested in the UFO phenomenon. It was later suggested
that
Starstream Research may have bumped into a counter-intelligence
operation
during the course of the investigation.
The founder of Starstream Research commented, "Although our
focus has been
on documented government interest in unusual phenomena for
intelligence
gathering, we suspect the use of phenomenology for intelligence
may be
closely tied to real cloak and dagger activities, both past and
present."
It is now known that the CIA previously welcomed UFO reports as
convenient
cover for real-life spy plane sightings. One theory is that
intelligence
operations continue to infiltrate the world-wide network of
phenomenologists
and encourage their activities for a similar purpose.
It is also suspected that other governments have similar
networks in place,
and that may be the source of the on-going concern over the UFO
material.
The extent of any additional reporting to the Office of the
Director of
National Intelligence (DNI) is not known.
Involvement by the FBI appears to have raised a red flag,
marking a
demarcation line drawn between personal interest in government
cover-up of
UFO phenomena and more serious issues involving top secret
clearance. There
has been a lot of finger pointing involved, and that is what
appears to have
lead to FBI involvement, when they were alerted to the UFO
activities during
a review of other security issues.
Some members of the AVIARY have developed the reputation of
being
'untouchable' in spite of semi-public breaches of confidential
information.
Visibility and Vulnerability
July 13, 2006
Today the Associated Press reported that Valerie Plame
has filed a lawsuit against Vice President Dick Cheney, his
former top advisor Karl Rove, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and
other staff members for conspiring to end her career by
revealing her clandestine CIA status, resulting in a media
frenzy.
Recently Starstream Research received a request from a
former high ranking CIA official not to publish or reveal
the officer's name and new position in a story that was
under development. After redaction of the officer's
confidential information, and review of the remaining story
contents, an editorial decision was made to kill the story.
The redacted version of the story had been briefly posted at
the Starstream Research web site.
In the original story, intended to be headlined at the
Starstream Research web site, the intelligence officer had
been
identified by name, based upon a series of emails that
had been widely distributed over the internet, and later reproduced
by at
least two different web sites. In making the
editorial decision to pull the story, it was determined that
an official's request to protect personal and national
security must take precedent over the newsworthiness of the
story, even though the sensitive information had already
been made publicly available.
In the world of intelligence, visibility is often equated
with vulnerability.According to Gary Bekkum, founder of
Starstream Research, "Although we do not know the exact
nature of the need for secrecy in this particular incident,
we understand the importance of preserving the safety of
those charged with protecting our national security. It is
unfortunate that Valerie Plame's career appears to be
fatally damaged. In the case of the Starstream Research
story we forwarded the original draft for review prior to
publication, and redacted the sensitive information. It was
never our intention to inflict an unnecessary risk on anyone
working in the intelligence community."
It is interesting to compare Robert Novak's comments
during
the July 12th, 2006, interview on Fox News "Hannity and
Colmes," with the decision made by Starstream Research to
redact the confidential information. Novak noted that, "If I
bowed to somebody who asked me not to write stories all the
time who are in government, about half the columns I write
would not be written, or a great deal would not be written."
As for his naming of Plame, he added, "If he [source] had
said to me at any time that she [Plame] was -- her life was
in danger, she was involved in undercover activities -- I
would not have written it. He never said that to me, never
made any such statement."
Covert Ops?
Is there a need for covert domestic special collection
activity by the intelligence community today, in the
paranormal and paraphysical research field? Consider this
clip from the STAR GATE files about the secret SRI
Stanford Research Institute experiments from 1975. Of the
test subjects, only one was aware of CIA sponsorship.
Headline Story Killed Over National Security Concerns
Starstream Research has pulled an on-going investigative
news article from publication at the request of an official of
the U.S. government, and his associate in the private sector.
In an email addressed to Starstream Research founder Gary S.
Bekkum, the officer requested removal of his name and position,
writing "These are irrelevant to your story and compromise personal
and national security." Following redaction of the sensitive
information, an associate of the officer raised additional
concerns about the content of the story, resulting in an
editorial decision to remove the article.
The request came in response to a Starstream Research inquiry
about leaked background information that made its way into a
widely distributed email list, resulting in exposure of the
confidential identity of a government official who reports
directly to John Negroponte, the Director of National
Intelligence.
The story was briefly posted on July 5th, 2006, and shortly
after removed from the Starstream Research website. The story
was dropped prior to release through the on-line newspaper "The
American Chronicle."
The original email included a series of allegations that were
passed through various parties on the internet, and shortly
thereafter appeared in a series of emails distributed to an
extensive list of contacts, including numerous scientists with
government email addresses, a Nobel prize winner, various
journalists, a former Director of the CIA, and other former and
present government employees and consultants. Several of the
recipients are high ranking intelligence officials and
consultants to the U.S. government in the area of national
security.
One of the allegations contained in the original series of
messages was that Starstream Research founder Gary S. Bekkum was
"a de-facto member of the Aquarium; we would expect you to play
this on the wild side, relatively speaking," implying that
Starstream Research might be part of an on-going
counter-intelligence operation.
Bekkum denies that he is involved in any intelligence operation,
"except to the extent that I maintain contacts with various
individuals that sometimes provide interesting leads for our
stories at the Starstream Research web site."
In the last year Starstream Research has focused on the CIA STAR
GATE files, a collection of over eighty-thousand pages of
previously classified documents about the efforts to use
psychics to spy on targets that could not be accessed using
conventional means. In 2005 Starstream Research uncovered a
series of documents in the STAR GATE collection featuring
imagery that strongly resembled the 9/11 events, suggesting that
some of the psychic spies may have foreseen 9/11 in the 1980's.
Many of the CIA released documents may be viewed at the
Starstream Research web site at:
www.starstreamresearch.com
Experimentalist Ken Shoulders Predicts Exotic Vacuum
Object Disruptor
July 5th, 2006
In a statement released today, Ken Shoulders predicts a new
application for his discovery of exotic vacuum objects, also
known as charge clusters.
According to Shoulders, "With the advent of a slight addition
to EVO technology ... a form of miniature disruptor device
capable of both initiation of munitions and destruction of
electronic communication and control devices becomes available."
Shoulders describes how an EVO may enter ammunition, leading
to detonation caused by the additional
excitation of the EVO as it passes through the shell casing.
Shoulders predicts that the applications of EVO technology
"seriously undermine the capability of governments to control
their populace by the form of force presently used."

↑ Grab this Headline Animator
|
|
|